26 October 2012

Lessons learned from fictional vignette writing

I originally started out the "Sam's Story/FC7" series to paint a picture of what a successful insurgency in the first world might look like from various perspectives.  I specifically wanted to highlight principles of electronic warfare in an first world environment (something that I think has been largely overlooked by ground forces the world over).  In the realm of a "thought experiment" fiction became a useful tool for framing a smaller part of a much bigger whole.

The truth is that Special Forces don't win wars (but don't tell them that).  Neither do Partizans or Guerillas.  From Francis Marion's successful campaign in the Revolutionary War many people mistakenly believe that hiding out in the woods and swamps is enough to win.  It is not.  At best the "irregular insurgent" can do is tie down a much larger conventional force.  The revolutionaries win by staying in the field after the empire has decided to take their ball and go home, and when that happens the revolutionaries need to have a functioning governing body to take advantage of the "power vacuum" or someone else will (hence the need for regular forces).  Even Disciple of Night's essay on General Paul von Lettow-Vorbeck over at John Mosby's blog reinforces my point, it is regulars who win wars on politically decisive terrain (something Lettow-Vorbeck utterly lacked). 

Successful Revolutions as a rule have a Regular fighting force of some kind.  From the Continental Army, Navy, and Marine Corps to the Peoples Liberation Army to the NVA, at some point the revolutionaries have to transition from irregulars to regulars or you end up with the Northern Ireland fiasco, a stalemate that lingers on and on.  The political situation is that Northern Ireland can hold a referendum any time it wants to reunite with the rest of the Emerald Isle, and the IRA has basically become yet another crime syndicate.

The untold parts of the story are what is really interesting.  Ask a Soldier who the greatest Teachers in the military are, and you'll either hear "Green Berets" or "Drill Sergeants" depending on the experience level of the Soldier you ask.  When you look at the function of a Drill Sergeant or a Green Beret, they are essentially the same, take a green recruit, or someone with a "school of hard knocks" education, and turn them into a fighting force to be feared.  Turning a volunteer into a trained fighter (or engineer, logistics expert, medic, etc) is how you grow the force, replace your losses, and generally go from a rabble into an Army. And so FC7 became the setting where I wanted to explore how such a thing could be accomplished.

 From Sam's perspective I wanted to make the point that even if you are functionally isolated and alone that your actions can still have positive consequences and repercussions on other people, even if you never meet them.  His lone wolf actions were the classic "partizan helping the regulars" that is in my opinion the most useful act of irregular forces in a "hybrid" fight.

From Julie's perspective I wanted to demonstrate an awareness of the electromagnetic spectrum, with things you can buy at WalMart or Radio Shack for pennies compared to some of the higher end commercial, industrial, or government spectrum awareness solutions.  The simple concepts of pulling batteries from electronic devices that emit radiation, using multiple commercial receivers to monitor for jamming, using frequencies that are unlikely to be jammed (such as commercial FM, who cares if you violate someones commercial rights if you are in open rebellion?), and placing them into a tactical setting where they made sense was really my only goal.

That I chose to make Julie a female generated more controversy than I ever expected.  I've gone to war with women who were smart, brave, and tough, and in any organization worth belonging to, talent matters more than rank.  If you won't follow a woman who knows what she's doing, but will follow a man who doesn't, that means you suck at following and should probably die of ass cancer.  On the flip side I've gone to war with women who were completely worthless oxygen thieves who were rightly drummed out of the service as quickly as possible (and more than a few men fell into that category too).  Just like only a few men become an Alexander (or a Patton), only a few women can become a Joan of Arc. 

The FC7 class vignettes were meant to portray some of what is necessary to grow an insurgency.  Having a noble band of a few at the beginning is completely wasted if the spark of freedom dies with them.  The networking, training, logistic support, all of it is useful. The easy part of an insurgency is tearing things down, the hard part of any endeavor is building things up.  Where would we be as a nation without the drilling and military expertise of Baron Von Steuben?

The one post in the series that elicited absolutely zero comments was the IRC log of insurgent leaders meeting.  The main purpose was to explain TOR anonymity and show that there was a large scale structure in place to coordinate operations and lines of effort across geography.  To be very honest I've been very surprised that a certain regional HQ in the middle east very far south of Afghanistan hasn't been repeatedly targeted by Al Qaeda (which is probably a hint that they aren't as big of an international terror organization as we have been lead to believe).  Anyways, a whole post of fake IRC traffic might have been just a bridge too far.

To top it all off, I could be wrong about everything.  History doesn't repeat itself, but it generally rhymes. I think that it is more important to get those interested in thinking about the bigger picture than "stockpiling ammo, food, and medicine" and looking at organizational structure, training, communication and coordination.  If you are going to tear something down, you better have something standing by to replace it.

14 comments:

Anonymous said...

Good points and you are right the tearing down is easy - but how do you transition to a new society. If you have not thought this out then someone else will steal your hard fought gains out from under you. Ask the the old VC hands how they felt when the NVA and party pushed them aside; or the russians who got head slapped by Lenin and the gang.

I hope you keep the FC7 series up- makes you think
MtnMan

Anonymous said...

If you are going to tear something down, you better have something standing by to replace it.

This is the biggest misconception about what's going on in America. So many gun owners, survivalists, patriots, and others are willing to jump the gun and talk about full blown revolution. For what? Does anybody really believe the "patriot network" is well connected enough to act as a full-scale government? If it is, why aren't we vetting candidates and getting them elected? The original revolution was fought by a fully functioning independent government, and so was the Civil War. If we can't even make a showing in Congress, why does anyone think that we're organized enough to make a difference?

Let's say there is a revolution, and the Huns are beaten; what then? What will happen when the people that talk big about revolution suddenly have to deal with a nation addicted to federal handouts, or 50 states all differing on what they want from a government? How will they react when they're suddenly in charge of choosing proper trade tariffs and tax codes? What happens if the sacred cows, like the Fair Tax, fail, and we're left responsible for inventing a new system as the Founders were? What happens if China uses the opportunity of crisis in America to launch an attack on American soil? How do we deal with the rise of mega-corporations who, by nature, erode national sovereignty and are creating a global world through international markets?

I mean, yeah, guns and ammo are great, but how about some books on macro and micro economics, or cracking open a copy of the US Federal Code? How many people who are (rightly) pissed about the PATRIOT Act or the NDAA actually took the time to read them?

When I look at America, I see a lot of pissed off, politically disenfranchised people. I don't see Washingtons, or Franklins, or Henrys. Who's willing to step up to the bat?

Anonymous said...

Keep the FC7 series going and I personally think that the IRC was a good touch and there was nothing to be added to it. You could in fact take the series in another direction and do a Freedom Factory 7 and talk about improvised communications equipment and guerilla gunsmithing.

catotheamerican said...

AM,
This posted of yours inspired this of mine:

http://catotheamerican.wordpress.com/2012/10/27/praxis-exercise-in-tech-savvy/

Thanks.

Anonymous said...

We're basically people without an elite, that elite siphoned off into distractions, with enough pay to keep them there.

What is left are angry reactionairies and would be revolutionairies, indians, no chiefs.

Every sort of FreeFor needs to slowly gain a sense of Will to Power coupled with an absolute belief in the disrepute of the establishment (honestly how hard can the latter be?)

The "Collapse" is on, assets and power will be there for the taking.

RobRoy

Joseph Martino said...

I enjoyed the vignettes and found them instructive. I'd like to see more.

Another Anon said...

I have been saying the same thing for a while now 12:57.

The patriots have just want to be left alone but are in an environment where they can't and won't be.

The hope that a big enough dieback will leave them enough room to do this is just that hope.

They had best be prepared to rule a small chunk of something or they'll fail before they start.

To the last point, some of us even folks like me who don't expect to be in the fight are paying attention. I did read the Patriot Act and th4e NDAA and I play closer attention to folks like our host.

I am not looking for a fight, probably won't get one but sometimes the fight finds you.

John Mosby said...

I think you are spot-on, AM. One of the most overlooked lessons of UW in SF is that, fundamentally, the purpose of the G force is to support operations by the conventional force, and if you don't have something better to replace what you're destroying, you might end up installing something far, far worse than what you're trying to get rid of.
One of the lessons I've tried to instill in my writing (and I probably do a better job of it in classes than in writing), is that you need to be networking outside of your five-man militia "battalion." From people who are like-minded and prepared, to the local soccer mom who abhors guns. If you cannot explain your goals concisely enough and professionally enough to convince Suzie Rottencrotch, you can't express them sufficiently to win support from the civilian populace. Secondly, as I've repeatedly written, and some guys are tired of hearing in classes, I'm sure, the only reason to learn tactical survival skills is so you can pass them on, professionally, and with the correct, useful frame of reference, to others, both in the short-term and the long-term. People have this image of SF as bad-ass, snake-eating, nation-overthrowing, man-killers (none of which are inherently wrong), but realistically, the core skills of SF would more properly be described as "network and mentor." If you're an asshole, historically, you wouldn't get far in SF.
John Mosby

Anonymous said...

An example you might find interesting is that of the American South and the insurrection against Reconstruction. Of course its violence was being written out of history even by the Southern winners so its hard to find sources, but violence was part and parcel of the overall strategy that was resolved via shady politics.

RobRoy

Anonymous said...

Fortunately, quite a number of people aren't in a tizzy about who the current Adamses, Jeffersons, or Franklins will be, since we have a plethora of examples and writings from the Original Cast.
So it isn't as if a patriot movement would have to pull an entire form of government out of their fourth point of contact and then try to gin up support for it.
The likelier question is at what stage of prior US history and federalism we'd prefer to coalesce: e.g. pre-1932, 1900, 1850, or what?

Your FC7 series was fascinating because an army field manual on how to pack a Bug Out Bag would be like unanesthetized root canal surgery, whereas the practical details of UW TTPs benefit enormously from the Hamburger Helper of a little fictional hypothetical prose.

Please continue as the mood strikes you. I daresay if all you did was condense and fictionalize the arcana of FMs into similarly captivating prose, you'd do a great service, not to mention find a second career as a published author.
It's no different than putting together any number of lectures with scenes from "The Guns of Navarrone", "Blackhawk Down", "Band Of Brothers", etc. as reference material. Using something besides Powerpoint and repetition in military instruction is overlooked, and you demonstrate a talent for the fictional approach.

-Aesop

LastBox said...

"The one post in the series that elicited absolutely zero comments was the IRC log of insurgent leaders meeting."

In my experience, the demographic you're writing to has very little interest / exposure to tech.

Skepticism, paranoia, and borderline smugness about the worthlessness of "new" technology.

Been running a Tor Wiki / Blog / IRC node for them for over a year now, running classes... Not a lot of uptake.

Anonymous said...

@LastBox

The role of the techie is one that isn't valued in any organisation... until they're urgently needed.

I think that Mosby covers it the best in his posts about the roles of the auxiliary in any FREEFOR that happens to be in existence. So to anyone reading... do as Mosby says and network, you'll never know when you'll need us.

Anon said...

AM, do ya REALLY think that Sean (the IT Techy Gamer geek) that went in to Benghazi with Stevens was NOT a fighter there???
HIS function may have been bigger than the Ambasador's, because HE was "connected" pretty much 24/7/365.25.....

AM said...

Anon,

Benghazi is not pertinent to this discussion, unless you care to make the argument that some potential state of revolution looks like something that happened in Libya. I think that would be quite the stretch.