Rifle Marksmanship is the basis for fire and maneuver. You can't maneuver freely unless the enemy is pinned down. Secondly, if you are doing fire and maneuver correctly the enemy is dead by the time you get to where the enemy is. John Mosby is a big fan of closing with and destroying the enemy, that is the role of the Infantry and how you decisively win an engagement. Lets take a few lessons from their tactical toolbox.
First lesson in "fire and maneuver" is that fire is the harder part. Anyone can run towards the enemy, not everyone can lay down a good effective base of fire.
I'm a fan of long range marksmanship because is builds the skills necessary for setting up a good base of fire. A lot of people think that you need "volume of fire" to be effective at suppressing the enemy. Ask anyone who was part of a fire team pinned down in an urban area for a while if that sniper put down a volume of fire, or just put accurate fire to keep them pinned in place. Suppression is defined by the effect it has on the enemy, not the volume of fire going out.
Nothing in the tactical toolbox is a silver bullet. Not extreme range rifle marksmanship, not explosives and demolitions, not indirect fire, not fire support, not civil engagement, not propaganda. Everything you do needs to be put into the context of an effective whole. Any single tool in the tool box will be rapidly countered by the enemy. You need a mix of tools so they can't easily predict your next move.
I stress marksmanship over CQB not because CQB is worthless, but because in terms of value added training it is worth less than long range marksmanship. In my experience taking a skilled rifleman and training on CQB will waste less rounds than taking a lesser skilled person and training them on CQB. It is a lot easier to teach someone "ready up" drills on a short range during active conflict than train them in long range marksmanship with facilities that are no longer exist for your side.
If you get caught in a long range ambush you need to be able to accurately return fire and assault through (or break contact from) the ambushing force. If you get a chance to conduct a far ambush accurate rifle fire is the best augmentation for a machine gun that you can get without having an IDF asset of your own. Train to shoot to the maximum effective range of your weapon system first, worry about CQB later.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

5 comments:
Great posts, AM. Brings back beautiful memories.
Semper Fi!
I agree with this. I think we're pretty much arriving at the same objective, just from different angles of attack. I agree 100% with the criticality of intermediate-distance marksmanship, and have said, in the past, and recently that it's criminal that Big Green has overlooked the intermediate distance for so long, and now only manages to approach it from a non-doctrinal SDM approach (unless something has changed recently and TRADOC has gotten off their collective fat-ass and developed a POI for SDM?). I think the CQB thing is WAY over-rated by too many, but only because guys take a couple of weekend classes and suddenly consider themselves SMEs on it. I've been doing it for twenty years, have been teaching it in various capacities for and am certainly not a MASTER. I think it's important to get the fundamentals of CQM simply for self-defense purposes. If a guy gets a precision level skillset in CQM, then changes focus to IDM, I'd say you're spot on.
As far as the ability to engage with accurate rifle fire to establish a base-of-fire? Fuck bro, it's the fundamental basis of the SUT classes I teach.
There is no standard POI for SDM, however there is a series of qualification tables in the latest marksmanship FM for SDMs. Unfortunately STRAC allocations haven't caught up to actually training SDMs to the FM standard.
AM,
Any chance you could summarize, excerpt, or link to the afore-mentioned SDM qual tables?
Never hurts to have a point of reference.
Thanks,
Aesop
AM, excellent contribution sir, contrasting effect achieved vs. # rounds.
Aesop, seek out FM 3-22.9, last I have Ch. 7 Sect. 7. That FM should be on the shelf. Hope that helps.
Post a Comment