You do the job you are paid to do. That is the "mercenary ethic" that just happens to be *gasp* the same as Joe the Plumbers "work ethic." Some people are paid to provide violence. Either for actual fighting or to be available for actual fighting. You can call it "security contracting" if you want, but in the end it is paid violence. This says nothing about whether the cause for violence is noble or altruistic. The old saying, "Football players and whores are in the same business, ruining their bodies for other peoples benefit" runs true for Soldiers of all stripes (and fortunes).
But this brings us back to the topic of killing. It takes a certain type of person who can kill for a paycheck. Someone who can turn off the human empathy that he or she would feel towards the victim and yet not become the psychopath that the Brady Bunch believes all gun owners to be. Joan Peterson likes to say that all gun owners are people on the edge ready to snap without warning. This couldn't be further from the truth. Very few people have the capacity to kill without first being threatened.
Most people have no problem with the use of force for self defense. What most people are squeamish about is killing for reasons OTHER than self defense. Rudyard Kipling's "The Jungle Book" boiled down the ethics of the jungle, "kill or be killed, eat or be eaten" which sums up generations of Western ethics on violence. So when it is your job to kill for a paycheck, you are just another jungle predator killing to eat. It isn't romantic, it isn't honorable, it just is what it is. And I see little difference between those who sign a contract and wear a uniform and those who just sign a contract. Serving under color of law is all fine and dandy until some illiterate tribesmen with a handicam beheads you to the sound of stirring music.
I've always tried to not BS myself and tell me that I'm doing things for some noble cause or some such. I do keep a list of people in my head who are worth dieing for, but lately my service has felt less like service to them and more like work for an administration bent on giving the UN a lease with option to buy on the US Military for a global "peacekeeping" force. There will always be people worth dieing for and killing for, but noble causes are few and far between.
I've had to take a long navel gaze over the years and ask myself I can kill to earn a paycheck and if I can live with myself afterward. I'm still here so the answer seems to be yes. A man I respect told me, "When you wake up three days in a row feeling like you can't make a difference in a fellow Soldiers life it is time to get out." So far that hasn't happened to me yet and I hope that it never does. But when it does, it will mean that I have somehow disconnected from an organization that I have invested in, and that is a clear sign to let go.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

3 comments:
You honestly acknowledge this fact and reality, and I really respect that.
I think you are grounded in reality, rather than head-in-the-clouds idealism. In that, you are better prepared for the harshness of your trade than are perhaps others.
Question- With the "mercenary ethics" applied, where do you draw the line between a paycheck and your oath? This is asked in all honesty...
Hypothetical-
If I refused to lay down my guns in the ultimate "door to door" gun confiscation scenario, do your ethics allow you to attempt to arrest or kill me?
If I stood with others in a peaceful protest, and you were ordered to break it up using violence, do your ethics allow you to do so in violation of the First Amendment.
Are you more inclined to follow such orders, or less inclined than is a "god and country" soldier, or a "I'm in it for the GI BIll" soldier?
While I respect your outlook on your profession, I would hate to end up on opposing sides of a rifle. A slugfest with the US military is a losing proposition.
Thanks for considering my questions.
Good luck and keep your head down.
AP
I've asked myself that same question. More than likely I wouldn't survive the purges needed to create an Army that would knock on your door (or kick it in) to violate your God given rights.
But if I happened to still be around when the order came down, I think giving Citizens more than enough warning to cache their arms and ammunition would be relatively simple. If only there were someone who knew ahead of time the future plans who were sympathetic to the cause of Freedom.
I mean, wouldn't have the French responded differently during the opening days of WWII if a few German Brigade staff officers were feeding them information?
If the citizens and the Army ever face off, then the Citizens need all the help they can get from wherever they can get it.
"If the citizens and the Army ever face off, then the Citizens need all the help they can get from wherever they can get it."
I agree. Having people in the right places has its advantages.
Your mercenary outlook puts you in a place to do this, over other types who might resign their commissions in the face of such orders and leave us blind. Or, worse yet, the types who would gun down their countrymen gladly as "their duty".
I realize that worst-case, "what if" questions aren't really fair, but thanks for playing along.
Well, here's to avoiding the purges...
Stay safe.
AP
Post a Comment