I had a brief email exchange with Brandon and the question, "when do we fight?" came up when dealing with the "boiling the frog" infringements upon the rights of citizens by the government.
The answer is "I don't know" and I wish I did. But the continual encroachment of Government may not turn into another revolution. I truly believe You Always Have Other Options (Y.A.H.O.O.) and as such a future choice between living in Orwell's dystopia or a restored mythical Libertarian Republic is a false dichotomy.
The socialist slide of the US does not have to end up turning into the UK or Red China. I have no doubts that is what the oppositions really wants, total government control from cradle to grave and the ability to crush dissent through rationing of goods and services before having to resort to naked force. But I think that the opposition is willing to settle for a "second best" option. The prags have teeth that the opposition respects because the threepers have the image of a barely checked seething mob ready for a showdown. But without the prags the fighting would already be on.
Many Scandinavian countries are every bit as socialist as the UK without having the ineffective nanny cams and oppressive Orwellian big brother to go with it. Switzerland is also highly socialized. But what do both Scandinavia and Switzerland have in common? Citizens who own guns and a relatively free market.
Do I want the US to follow either model of EuroSocialism? No. I would much rather have the government out of the business of redistributing poverty. But I think that the opposition is willing to settle on turning the US into one big Sweden instead of forcing the hand of citizens into open insurrection.
So the tampering with of the (relatively) free market worries me more than the gun issue. If the market turns into a command economy the Yugoslavia option looks more likely than the Sweden option. Civil war is a dirty, nasty thing. Not like the nice clean wars we are used to where the Air Force bombs then the Army and Marines move in to occupy, and we lose less than a thousand servicemen a year. I know that there are those who will fight if a naked power grab for guns happens, and there are many in the Army who are experts at finding AK's in Iraq who will not be able to find a single firearm in a three block radius when ordered to confiscate guns from Smalltown, USA.
I guess I should explain Yugoslavia briefly. A brutal dictator united people of differing religious, ethnic, and cultural backgrounds under a cult of personality. Then he died and the ethnic cleansing began. Imagine the people of Iowa refusing by force of arms to give up freely their property to the citizens of Chicago, and the people of Chicago trying to take that corn by force. A fragmented nation caused by the breakdown of a common social identity leading to civil war. Could it happen in the US? I hope not, but if the economy stalled someone in .gov might be stupid enough to say "just take the food, the farmers should be grateful someone even wants it." and then life would suck for everybody. Thankfully our current cult of personality leader is even more polarizing than W was.
If the powers that be continue to screw with the economy it may lead to the collapse that requires the confiscation of guns for "security reasons." If that happens it is better to die on your feet than die on your knees. I wish I could accurately predict the future, but if I COULD tell people when to fight it would already time to be fighting.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

8 comments:
The time to fight, unfortunately, is only once the other side throws the first blow.
Remember, he who throws the first punch in a gun-fight loses.
There will come a time when, because it owns our government, the (Khaz)Aristocracy will tell the Papistocrats in Washington to grab the guns.
As it was when they tried it through King George, THAT is our "go" signal!
Wait for it. You'll know when, without a doubt.
P.S. I hate waiting.
That is what I had to tell the NRA when they called for a donation a couple weeks back wanting $100+ to stop "gun grabbing congressmen". I first had to decline ($100+ is my monthly grocery allowance) and I told them I was tired of this knit-picking. I told them, "let them make the laws to take my guns and then we will see what happens when they try to enforce it". I can always go by the President's train and though that if I don't think the law is constitutional that I don't have to follow it. Course my luck they will come for my guns when I am at work and my wife at home will be point out were I hide them.
A good friend of mine coined a phrase a few years ago, the term was "balkonization of the U.S." We seem to be splitting on social and racial lines, the common denominator of our language and culture of being "Americans" seems to be fading. We have people that identify more with group idenity and dynamics than being an individuals.
What if the other side is deliberately engineering a collapse, so that they'll be able to clamp down total control? Didn't Rahm Emmanuel famously say something like, "you can do things in a crisis that you can't do at other times"?
I know this is full-tilt conspiracy theory stuff. But what would be different in the actual policies if they weren't trying to engineer a complete statist takeover of the country?
I don't care if it's socialism, fascism or you-name-it-ism; if it's not liberty, I don't want it.
Graybeard, if you know the goals and desired endstate of the opposition it allows you to counter.
All that I am saying is that the current lack of liberty does not have to end up in bloodshed, and that it is possible to restore liberty without bloodshed.
Seriously, what is the Opposition going to do if 80 million armed Americans started demanding their God given rights and a limited Republic?
Anyone who believes that the English aristocracy or more base working man population gave up all their guns has not been to the Island lately.
The English population who remember WWII have no intention of 'Going quietly into the night.'
Post a Comment